PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.18%
Negative revenue growth while MLM stands at 31.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-92.55%
Negative gross profit growth while MLM is at 118.30%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.04%
Negative EBIT growth while MLM is at 255.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.04%
Negative operating income growth while MLM is at 255.28%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.18%
Negative net income growth while MLM stands at 474.65%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Share count expansion well above MLM's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-4.39%
Reduced diluted shares while MLM is at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.63%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to MLM's 162.32%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
104.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MLM's 105.01%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
56.67%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MLM's 53.80%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
Below 50% of MLM's 109.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
56.61%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 36.51%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.