PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-90.38%
Negative revenue growth while MLM stands at 4.92%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
28.82%
Positive gross profit growth while MLM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
38.02%
Positive EBIT growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
38.02%
Positive operating income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
166.26%
Positive net income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
156.25%
EPS growth of 156.25% while MLM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
146.67%
Diluted EPS growth of 146.67% while MLM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
1.70%
Slight or no buybacks while MLM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
12.70%
Slight or no buyback while MLM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.09%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MLM stands at 159.04%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-80.65%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MLM stands at 95.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-87.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MLM stands at 37.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
192.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 76.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
57.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 13.87%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.