PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.90%
Revenue growth under 50% of MLM's 43.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-67.09%
Negative gross profit growth while MLM is at 365.31%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.13%
Negative EBIT growth while MLM is at 1744.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.13%
Negative operating income growth while MLM is at 1744.60%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
13.90%
Net income growth under 50% of MLM's 605.85%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.33%
EPS growth under 50% of MLM's 600.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MLM's 595.45%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.01%
Share reduction while MLM is at 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.05%
Reduced diluted shares while MLM is at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
187.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MLM's 230.25%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
60.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 93.63%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
16.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MLM's 38.48%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.62%
Similar net income/share CAGR to MLM's 173.93%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
32.81%
Below 50% of MLM's 66.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-36.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MLM is 23.79%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 43.59%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.