PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.72%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MLM's 1.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
380.04%
Positive gross profit growth while MLM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2200.72%
Positive EBIT growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2200.72%
Positive operating income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
272.22%
Positive net income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
276.92%
Positive EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
276.92%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.23%
Share count expansion well above MLM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.12%
Reduced diluted shares while MLM is at 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
292.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 216.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
88.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 67.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
121.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 30.93%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
516.49%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 66.18% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
89.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 0.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-23.58%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while MLM invests at 1.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.