111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.04%
Negative gross profit growth while MLM is at 366.21%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-95.63%
Negative EBIT growth while MLM is at 838.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-95.63%
Negative operating income growth while MLM is at 838.82%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.04%
Share reduction while MLM is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.05%
Reduced diluted shares while MLM is at 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.78%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to MLM's 226.45%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
37.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 62.15%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
14.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 24.45%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.78%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MLM's 102.69%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-42.16%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MLM is 3.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-18.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 27.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
