PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.26%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MLM's 2.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
339.49%
Positive gross profit growth while MLM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1632.99%
Positive EBIT growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1632.99%
Positive operating income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
103.24%
Net income growth above 1.5x MLM's 0.49%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
104.26%
EPS growth above 1.5x MLM's 1.20%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
104.26%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MLM's 1.23%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
305.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 203.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
101.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 29.07%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
25.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MLM's 27.53%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
335.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 180.36% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
110.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 77.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
64.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of MLM's 80.79%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while MLM invests at 5.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.