PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
682.43%
Positive gross profit growth while MLM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
140.62%
Positive EBIT growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
140.62%
Positive operating income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-48.59%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-99.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-99.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
354.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 155.24%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
215.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 65.69%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
106.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 31.88%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
255.61%
Below 50% of MLM's 741.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
487.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 218.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
105.84%
Below 50% of MLM's 235.77%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above MLM's 4.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.