PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.57%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MLM stands at 31.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
28.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 56.41%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
21.92%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 39.51%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.80%
Below 50% of MLM's 225.64%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-10.75%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MLM stands at 54.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-40.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MLM is at 90.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
671.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 229.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
685.96%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 138.90%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-24.85%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MLM stands at 213.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
31.40%
Below 50% of MLM's 146.69%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
18.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MLM's 20.42%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.31%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to MLM's 10.04%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
45.93%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 15.06%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.