PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.86%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MLM stands at 38.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-21.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MLM stands at 26.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.37%
Below 50% of MLM's 35.90%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-15.90%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MLM stands at 8.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
454.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 93.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
41.58%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 18.91%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.94%
Below 50% of MLM's 132.17%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
22.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MLM's 21.64%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.56%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 20.32%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
8.38%
Below 50% of MLM's 20.45%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.