111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.82%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MLM stands at 46.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-37.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MLM stands at 22.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.98%
Below 50% of MLM's 51.78%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
38.24%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 54.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.73%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MLM is 132.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-73.18%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 45.70%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
46.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 27.07%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.69%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 42.22%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
85.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 28.51%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.