PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.12%
Negative revenue growth while MLM stands at 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.85%
Negative gross profit growth while MLM is at 20.63%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.15%
Negative EBIT growth while MLM is at 22.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.15%
Negative operating income growth while MLM is at 22.30%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.18%
Negative net income growth while MLM stands at 19.74%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.29%
Negative EPS growth while MLM is at 19.72%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MLM is at 19.79%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.78%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-36.67%
Dividend reduction while MLM stands at 11.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.40%
OCF growth at 75-90% of MLM's 26.82%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
20.85%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x MLM's 18.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.08%
Inventory is declining while MLM stands at 4.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.35%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.05%
We have a declining book value while MLM shows 5.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
9.58%
We have some new debt while MLM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.94%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.