PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.77%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MLM's 41.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
103.38%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MLM's 90.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
6432.14%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MLM's 159.74%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
6432.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MLM's 159.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
1018.10%
Positive net income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1081.25%
Positive EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1075.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.66%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-36.31%
Dividend reduction while MLM stands at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
309.39%
Positive OCF growth while MLM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
171.54%
Positive FCF growth while MLM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MLM's 98.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MLM stands at 29.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
733.85%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MLM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.99%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
3001.72%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 274.17% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
112.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 32.23%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
140.48%
Below 50% of MLM's 325.48%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.38%
Below 50% of MLM's 46.38%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
114.32%
10Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 86.07%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if a higher payout growth rate remains sustainable long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MLM invests at 30.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
22.82%
AR growth well above MLM's 29.30%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-2.27%
Inventory is declining while MLM stands at 2.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.82%
Asset growth above 1.5x MLM's 0.57%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.77%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MLM's 0.07%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
3.16%
We have some new debt while MLM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.01%
We expand SG&A while MLM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.