PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.07%
Positive revenue growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
126.19%
Positive gross profit growth while PUK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
81150.00%
Positive EBIT growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
81150.00%
Positive operating income growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4382.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x PUK's 79.36%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
3260.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x PUK's 80.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
3240.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x PUK's 80.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.55%
Share reduction while PUK is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.07%
Diluted share count expanding well above PUK's 0.11%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
348.73%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x PUK's 289.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
222.63%
FCF growth 75-90% of PUK's 280.69%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
19.40%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-7.17%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
67.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
454.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 172.80%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
709.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 268.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
74.50%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2171.35%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 3.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
262.25%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
527.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 70.44%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
100.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PUK's 157.89%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
52.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 33.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 5.41%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
165.77%
Stable or rising dividend while PUK is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
143.14%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PUK is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
50.42%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while PUK cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.55%
Under 50% of PUK's 23.74%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.90%
SG&A growth of 120.90% while PUK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.