PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.24%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-3.41%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
33.22%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
26.97%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PUK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
10.06%
Positive OCF/share growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-25.35%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
518.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
18.05%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
197.03%
Positive short-term CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
120.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PUK's 179.60%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
50.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 30.92%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
15.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PUK's 10.61%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PUK invests at 24.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
15.06%
AR growth of 15.06% while PUK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
5.72%
Inventory growth of 5.72% while PUK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
5.72%
Similar asset growth to PUK's 5.20%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
5.72%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PUK's 3.80%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
7.11%
Debt growth far above PUK's 2.59%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.