PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.77%
Positive revenue growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
103.38%
Positive gross profit growth while PUK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
6432.14%
Positive EBIT growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6432.14%
Positive operating income growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1018.10%
Positive net income growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1081.25%
Positive EPS growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1075.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.66%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-36.31%
Dividend reduction while PUK stands at 128.85%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
309.39%
OCF growth at 50-75% of PUK's 603.77%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
171.54%
FCF growth under 50% of PUK's 569.45%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
24.81%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PUK stands at 78.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
733.85%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 370.02%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PUK's 983.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
3001.72%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
112.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to PUK's 111.73%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
140.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 92.26%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.38%
Below 50% of PUK's 303.27%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
114.32%
Stable or rising dividend while PUK is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PUK invests at 440.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
22.82%
AR growth of 22.82% while PUK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-2.27%
Inventory is declining while PUK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.82%
Positive asset growth while PUK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.77%
Positive BV/share change while PUK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.16%
We have some new debt while PUK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.01%
SG&A growth of 9.01% while PUK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.