PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.54%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VMC's 1.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
483.23%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VMC's 6.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
2778.72%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VMC's 12.32%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
2778.72%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VMC's 12.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
307.97%
Net income growth above 1.5x VMC's 15.82%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
283.33%
EPS growth above 1.5x VMC's 15.19%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
275.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VMC's 15.38%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
22.77%
Share count expansion well above VMC's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
23.91%
Slight or no buyback while VMC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.99%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to VMC's 233.61%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
100.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to VMC's 93.80%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
64.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to VMC's 64.68%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
469.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 249.47% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
106.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 51.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
97.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 2.09%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.