PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-27.63%
Negative revenue growth while VMC stands at 308.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
23.14%
Positive gross profit growth while VMC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
144.19%
Positive EBIT growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
144.19%
Positive operating income growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-55.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
131.86%
Positive EPS growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
132.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
258.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 86.07%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
71.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 0.45%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
95.20%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VMC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.14%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of VMC's 252.01%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
126.75%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to VMC's 128.66%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
211.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of VMC's 361.58%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above VMC's 55.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.