111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.75%
Negative revenue growth while VMC stands at 47.95%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-71.54%
Negative gross profit growth while VMC is at 128.09%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.45%
Negative EBIT growth while VMC is at 309.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.45%
Negative operating income growth while VMC is at 309.57%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-7.86%
Negative net income growth while VMC stands at 123.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
5.56%
EPS growth under 50% of VMC's 124.53%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of VMC's 125.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-11.52%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-11.51%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
277.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 116.59%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
84.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 16.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
80.61%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 4.03%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.86%
Similar net income/share CAGR to VMC's 170.14%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
141.24%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 57.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
184.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 84.93%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 48.60%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
59.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 28.00%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.