PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.83%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VMC's 2.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
334.67%
Positive gross profit growth while VMC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1494.64%
Positive EBIT growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1494.64%
Positive operating income growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
93.84%
Positive net income growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
92.06%
Positive EPS growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
93.55%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.20%
Share count expansion well above VMC's 0.19%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.24%
Slight or no buyback while VMC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
370.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 101.29%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
149.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 22.35%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
88.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 8.68%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
367.08%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 96.39% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
146.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 87.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
83.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 46.46%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.