PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.57%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
28.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VMC's 59.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
21.92%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of VMC's 34.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.80%
Below 50% of VMC's 653.52%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-10.75%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VMC stands at 303.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-40.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
671.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 445.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
685.96%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 233.16%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-24.85%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VMC stands at 6.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
31.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with VMC's 29.48%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
18.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to VMC's 19.37%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.31%
Below 50% of VMC's 2702.82%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
45.93%
Below 50% of VMC's 179.83%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.