PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.64%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-22.15%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-41.01%
Negative EBIT growth while VMC is at 23.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-43.79%
Negative operating income growth while VMC is at 18.96%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-45.82%
Negative net income growth while VMC stands at 41.47%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-48.24%
Negative EPS growth while VMC is at 41.40%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-48.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VMC is at 41.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.47%
Share reduction while VMC is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.26%
Reduced diluted shares while VMC is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.05%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while VMC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
79.61%
Positive OCF growth while VMC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
82.16%
Positive FCF growth while VMC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-8.62%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VMC stands at 145.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-22.98%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VMC stands at 56.47%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-36.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VMC stands at 15.83%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
113.92%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VMC's 297.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
2.59%
Below 50% of VMC's 30.37%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
18.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VMC's 53.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
48.90%
Below 50% of VMC's 671.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-9.58%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VMC is 108.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-51.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VMC is 113.51%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
131.60%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VMC's 94.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
50.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VMC's 44.59%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
22.17%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to VMC's 24.51%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
140.45%
Below 50% of VMC's 667.21%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
81.94%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 48.37%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
53.18%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 24.21%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-24.95%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.39%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VMC's 5.26%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.19%
Negative asset growth while VMC invests at 19.18%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.90%
We have a declining book value while VMC shows 3.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.28%
We’re deleveraging while VMC stands at 52.06%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.49%
We cut SG&A while VMC invests at 6.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.