PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.83%
Negative revenue growth while Construction Materials median is -11.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-41.87%
Negative gross profit growth while Construction Materials median is -7.76%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-97.12%
Negative EBIT growth while Construction Materials median is -26.44%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-98.37%
Negative operating income growth while Construction Materials median is -36.01%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-112.82%
Negative net income growth while Construction Materials median is -13.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-114.56%
Negative EPS growth while Construction Materials median is -5.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-114.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Construction Materials median is -5.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.25%
Share reduction while Construction Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.02%
Diluted share reduction while Construction Materials median is -0.01%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
5.91%
Dividend growth of 5.91% while Construction Materials median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-124.14%
Negative OCF growth while Construction Materials median is -36.85%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-172.97%
Negative FCF growth while Construction Materials median is -70.50%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
15.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Construction Materials median of 54.23%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
15.40%
Below 50% of Construction Materials median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
15.40%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Construction Materials median of 6.68%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-7.82%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Construction Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-7.82%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Construction Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-7.82%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Construction Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-268.56%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Construction Materials median of 176.55%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-268.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Construction Materials median is 63.38%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-268.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Construction Materials median is 15.38%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
12.03%
Below 50% of Construction Materials median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
12.03%
Below 50% of Construction Materials median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
12.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Construction Materials median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
-64.08%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Construction Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-64.08%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Construction Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-64.08%
Dividend reductions while Construction Materials median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
6.66%
Receivables growth far exceeding Construction Materials median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
4.31%
Inventory growth far above Construction Materials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
2.58%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Construction Materials median of 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-1.91%
Negative BV/share change while Construction Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
11.01%
Debt growth far outpacing Construction Materials median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.17%
SG&A decline while Construction Materials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.