PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.83%
Negative revenue growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-41.87%
Negative gross profit growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-97.12%
Negative EBIT growth while Basic Materials median is 13.58%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-98.37%
Negative operating income growth while Basic Materials median is 13.54%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-112.82%
Negative net income growth while Basic Materials median is 14.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-114.56%
Negative EPS growth while Basic Materials median is 14.55%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-114.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Basic Materials median is 13.01%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.25%
Share reduction while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.02%
Diluted share reduction while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
5.91%
Dividend growth of 5.91% while Basic Materials median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-124.14%
Negative OCF growth while Basic Materials median is -25.96%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-172.97%
Negative FCF growth while Basic Materials median is -30.63%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
15.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 2.89%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
15.40%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Basic Materials median of 11.65%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
15.40%
3Y CAGR of 15.40% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-7.82%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-7.82%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-7.82%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-268.56%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Basic Materials median of 46.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-268.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Basic Materials median is 48.75%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-268.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Basic Materials median is -17.76%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
12.03%
Below 50% of Basic Materials median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
12.03%
Below 50% of Basic Materials median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
12.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 5.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-64.08%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-64.08%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-64.08%
Dividend reductions while Basic Materials median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
6.66%
Receivables growth far exceeding Basic Materials median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
4.31%
Inventory growth of 4.31% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.58%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-1.91%
Negative BV/share change while Basic Materials median is 0.05%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
11.01%
Debt growth of 11.01% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.17%
SG&A decline while Basic Materials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.