111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.77
D/E of 0.77 while CX has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
7.38
Net debt while CX maintains net cash position. John Neff would demand higher returns to justify the additional leverage risk.
-9.68
Negative coverage while CX shows 3.50. Joel Greenblatt would look for operating improvements and turnaround potential.
1.74
Current ratio exceeding 1.5x CX's 0.86. Charlie Munger would verify if this advantage translates to better supplier terms.
23.92%
Intangibles of 23.92% while CX has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.
