PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
51.07%
Positive growth while CPAC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
25.64%
Cost increase while CPAC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
119.16%
Positive growth while CPAC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
45.08%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CPAC's 1.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar other expenses growth to CPAC's 114.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
16.55%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CPAC's 1.41%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
23.18%
Total costs growth while CPAC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-210.50%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
315.14%
EBITDA growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
174.81%
EBITDA margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10650.00%
Operating income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7016.11%
Operating margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.15%
Other expenses reduction while CPAC shows 2.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1302.74%
Pre-tax income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
896.17%
Pre-tax margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-632.76%
Tax expense reduction while CPAC shows 2.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1503.19%
Net income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1028.86%
Net margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1400.00%
EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1393.33%
Diluted EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.28%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.15%
Diluted share increase while CPAC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.