PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-27.63%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
23.14%
Positive growth while CPAC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
70.16%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CPAC's 1.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CPAC's 1.41%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
D&A growth while CPAC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.19%
EBITDA growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
161.06%
EBITDA margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
144.19%
Operating income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
161.06%
Operating margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CPAC shows 2.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
55.08%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CPAC's 2.56%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-55.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
131.86%
EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
132.14%
Diluted EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.