PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
27.06%
Positive growth while CPAC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
316.29%
Positive growth while CPAC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
227.62%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CPAC's 1.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar other expenses growth to CPAC's 114.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while CPAC shows 1.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
D&A growth while CPAC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1776.84%
EBITDA growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1377.08%
EBITDA margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1708.06%
Operating income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1322.95%
Operating margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CPAC's 2.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-956.59%
Tax expense reduction while CPAC shows 2.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
132.28%
Net income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.81%
Net margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.26%
EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.26%
Diluted EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.99%
Share count increase while CPAC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.42%
Diluted share increase while CPAC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.