111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.55%
Positive growth while CPAC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.24%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.91%
Margin decline while CPAC shows 1.05% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.17%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.18%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CPAC's 2.56%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
3.82%
Net income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.17%
EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.17%
Diluted EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.35%
Share count increase while CPAC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.30%
Diluted share increase while CPAC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.