PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.12%
Revenue decline while CPAC shows 16.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.25%
Cost reduction while CPAC shows 18.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.85%
Gross profit decline while CPAC shows 14.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while CPAC shows 12.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CPAC shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.62%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CPAC's 12.38%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.03%
Total costs reduction while CPAC shows 16.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.00%
Interest expense reduction while CPAC shows 11.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.31%
D&A reduction while CPAC shows 10.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.72%
EBITDA decline while CPAC shows 14.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.15%
Operating income decline while CPAC shows 16.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.76%
Pre-tax income decline while CPAC shows 12.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.99%
Tax expense reduction while CPAC shows 27.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.18%
Net income decline while CPAC shows 6.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.29%
EPS decline while CPAC shows 5.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.46%
Diluted EPS decline while CPAC shows 5.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.18%
Share count reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.78%
Diluted share reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.