111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.55%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-21.65%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-46.45%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.59%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.36%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.64%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-58.77%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-51.93%
EBITDA decline while CPAC shows 14.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-96.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
353.57%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CPAC's 2.56%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-91.93%
Pre-tax income decline while CPAC shows 26.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while CPAC shows 36.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.24%
Tax expense reduction while CPAC shows 7.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-88.18%
Net income decline while CPAC shows 37.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.97%
Net margin decline while CPAC shows 47.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.32%
EPS decline while CPAC shows 38.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.32%
Diluted EPS decline while CPAC shows 38.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.85%
Share count reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.06%
Diluted share reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
