111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.92%
Positive growth while CX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.98%
Cost increase while CX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
10.45%
Positive growth while CX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.41%
Margin expansion while CX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.11%
G&A growth while CX reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.75%
Other expenses growth less than half of CX's 3344.68%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
13.49%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CX's 4.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.28%
Total costs growth while CX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.81%
Similar interest expense growth to CX's 6.04%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
7.79%
D&A growth while CX reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.92%
EBITDA growth while CX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.31%
EBITDA margin growth while CX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.38%
Operating income growth while CX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.13%
Similar other expenses growth to CX's 33.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
9.35%
Pre-tax income growth while CX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.39%
Pre-tax margin growth while CX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.49%
Tax expense growth while CX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.32%
Net income growth below 50% of CX's 76.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.22%
Net margin decline while CX shows 93.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.29%
EPS growth below 50% of CX's 68.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.79%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CX's 68.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.57%
Share count reduction while CX shows 3.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.48%
Diluted share reduction while CX shows 3.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.