111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.07%
Revenue decline while MLM shows 33.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.07%
Gross profit decline while MLM shows 62.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.07%
EBITDA decline while MLM shows 146.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of MLM's 1447.83%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.41%
Tax expense reduction while MLM shows 156.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
48.41%
Net income growth below 50% of MLM's 182.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
57.99%
Net margin growth 50-75% of MLM's 111.25%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
60.00%
EPS growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.24%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-7.24%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.