PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-90.38%
Revenue decline while MLM shows 4.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while MLM shows 7.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
28.82%
Positive growth while MLM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1239.12%
Margin expansion while MLM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while MLM shows 6.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while MLM shows 55.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
28.82%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MLM's 2.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1304.70%
EBITDA margin growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.02%
Operating income growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1334.73%
Operating margin growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while MLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-777.50%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
166.26%
Net income growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2667.88%
Net margin growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
156.25%
EPS change of 156.25% while MLM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
146.67%
Diluted EPS change of 146.67% while MLM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1.70%
Share count increase while MLM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.70%
Diluted share increase while MLM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.