PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.92%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MLM's 7.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
7.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x MLM's 3.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.45%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MLM's 15.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.41%
Margin expansion below 50% of MLM's 8.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.11%
G&A change of 12.11% while MLM maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.75%
Other expenses growth while MLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.49%
Operating expenses growth while MLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.28%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MLM's 2.27%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.81%
Interest expense growth while MLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.79%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x MLM's 7.04%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
6.92%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MLM's 18.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.31%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MLM's 11.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.38%
Operating income growth below 50% of MLM's 22.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.41%
Operating margin decline while MLM shows 14.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.13%
Other expenses growth while MLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.35%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MLM's 23.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.39%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MLM's 14.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.49%
Similar tax expense growth to MLM's 21.79%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
4.32%
Net income growth below 50% of MLM's 23.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.22%
Net margin decline while MLM shows 15.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.29%
EPS growth below 50% of MLM's 24.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.79%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MLM's 24.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.48%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.