PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.83%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.85%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-41.87%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.17%
G&A reduction while MLM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.73%
Other expenses reduction while MLM shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.53%
Operating expenses reduction while MLM shows 54.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.24%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
13.13%
Similar interest expense growth to MLM's 12.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-11.83%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-70.87%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-98.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.17%
Other expenses reduction while MLM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-114.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-119.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-140.56%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-112.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.56%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.25%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.02%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.