111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.07%
Revenue decline while SUM shows 4.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.07%
Gross profit decline while SUM shows 7.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.07%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.07%
Operating income decline while SUM shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.41%
Tax expense reduction while SUM shows 29.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
48.41%
Net income growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.99%
Net margin growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.00%
EPS change of 60.00% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
60.00%
Diluted EPS change of 60.00% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-7.24%
Share count reduction while SUM shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.24%
Diluted share reduction while SUM shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.