111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
51.63%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 4.73%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.63%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 7.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.63%
EBITDA growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.63%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.00%
Tax expense reduction while SUM shows 29.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
114.00%
Net income growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.13%
Net margin growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EPS change of 100.00% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
100.00%
Diluted EPS change of 100.00% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
7.00%
Share count reduction below 50% of SUM's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
7.00%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SUM's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.