PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.75%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SUM's 4.73%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.75%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SUM's 7.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.75%
EBITDA growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.75%
Operating income growth below 50% of SUM's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.70%
Tax expense reduction while SUM shows 29.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.70%
Net income growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.76%
EPS change of 4.76% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
4.76%
Diluted EPS change of 4.76% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1.97%
Share count reduction while SUM shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.97%
Diluted share reduction while SUM shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.