PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.55%
Revenue decline while SUM shows 21.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.65%
Cost reduction while SUM shows 36.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-46.45%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.59%
Operating expenses reduction while SUM shows 14.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.36%
Total costs reduction while SUM shows 34.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.64%
Interest expense reduction while SUM shows 68.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-58.77%
D&A reduction while SUM shows 76.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-51.93%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-96.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
353.57%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-91.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.24%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-88.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.32%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.32%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.85%
Share count reduction while SUM shows 40.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.06%
Diluted share reduction while SUM shows 39.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.