111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.64%
Revenue decline while SUM shows 4.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.56%
Cost reduction while SUM shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-22.15%
Gross profit decline while SUM shows 7.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.71%
Margin decline while SUM shows 2.65% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.49%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.61%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.86%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.18%
Total costs reduction while SUM shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.44%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
15.65%
D&A growth while SUM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.53%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.79%
Operating income decline while SUM shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.36%
Operating margin decline while SUM shows 3.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.57%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-47.92%
Pre-tax income decline while SUM shows 5.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while SUM shows 0.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.07%
Tax expense reduction while SUM shows 29.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.24%
EPS decline while SUM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.22%
Diluted EPS decline while SUM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.47%
Share count reduction while SUM shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction while SUM shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.