111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.83%
Revenue decline while SUM shows 4.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-13.85%
Cost reduction while SUM shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-41.87%
Gross profit decline while SUM shows 7.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-23.68%
Margin decline while SUM shows 2.65% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.17%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.73%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.53%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.24%
Total costs reduction while SUM shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.13%
Interest expense growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.83%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-70.87%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-98.37%
Operating income decline while SUM shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.86%
Operating margin decline while SUM shows 3.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.17%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-114.79%
Pre-tax income decline while SUM shows 5.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-119.42%
Pre-tax margin decline while SUM shows 0.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.56%
Tax expense reduction while SUM shows 29.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-112.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.56%
EPS decline while SUM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.71%
Diluted EPS decline while SUM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while SUM shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.02%
Diluted share reduction while SUM shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.