PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
69.54%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 1.51%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while USLM shows 0.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
483.23%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 2.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
244.01%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x USLM's 1.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while USLM shows 2.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while USLM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while USLM shows 2.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while USLM shows 0.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while USLM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while USLM shows 7.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2507.18%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 4.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1552.86%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 2.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2778.72%
Operating income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1597.96%
Operating margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while USLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1148.94%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
307.97%
Net income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
140.63%
Net margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
283.33%
EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
275.00%
Diluted EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.77%
Share count reduction below 50% of USLM's 1.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
23.91%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of USLM's 1.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.