PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
28.94%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 6.90%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while USLM shows 4.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
330.73%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 10.44%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
234.05%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x USLM's 3.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while USLM shows 2.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while USLM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while USLM shows 2.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while USLM shows 3.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while USLM shows 30.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while USLM shows 31.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1626.69%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 17.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1349.03%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 29.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1860.29%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 15.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1420.28%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 7.94%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while USLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-935.22%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
186.44%
Net income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
122.14%
Net margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
186.96%
EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
186.96%
Diluted EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.32%
Share count increase while USLM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.38%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x USLM's 2.18%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.