PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.83%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 2.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
334.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 45.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
242.72%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x USLM's 41.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while USLM shows 7.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while USLM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while USLM shows 7.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while USLM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x USLM's 0.84%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
1541.81%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 36.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1194.48%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 34.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1494.64%
Operating income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1157.28%
Operating margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while USLM shows 1.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-695.50%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
93.84%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 0.47%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
52.83%
Net margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.06%
EPS change of 92.06% while USLM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
93.55%
Diluted EPS change of 93.55% while USLM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x USLM's 0.47%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.24%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of USLM's 0.47%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.