PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
32.63%
Some net income increase while BIDU is negative at -7.45%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
15.10%
Less D&A growth vs. BIDU's 32.56%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-72.02%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.04%
Negative yoy SBC while BIDU is 17.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
11.57%
Working capital change of 11.57% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-82.08%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
527.78%
Inventory growth of 527.78% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-15.98%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
26.01%
Growth of 26.01% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-203.85%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -227.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
16.61%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -25.65%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -86.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
81.52%
Acquisition growth of 81.52% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-10.67%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-24.68%
We reduce yoy sales while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
94.35%
Growth well above BIDU's 108.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-66.74%
We reduce yoy invests while BIDU stands at 26.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-6.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -266.76%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.