PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.94%
Some net income increase while BIDU is negative at -26.61%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-5.67%
Negative yoy D&A while BIDU is 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
169.90%
Some yoy growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-1.12%
Negative yoy SBC while BIDU is 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-403.94%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BIDU at -126.63%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
145.80%
AR growth while BIDU is negative at -416.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-225.66%
Negative yoy inventory while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
138.67%
AP growth of 138.67% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-244.49%
Negative yoy usage while BIDU is 180.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
27.85%
Well above BIDU's 25.31%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-22.19%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BIDU at -22.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-17.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 50.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-158.76%
Negative yoy acquisition while BIDU stands at 52.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
19.40%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. BIDU's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
17.45%
We have some liquidation growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
4438.46%
We have some outflow growth while BIDU is negative at -1636.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
55.73%
We have mild expansions while BIDU is negative at -79.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
28.58%
Debt repayment well below BIDU's 91.83%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.