PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-3.53%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 29.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
14.57%
D&A growth well above BIDU's 15.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-68.81%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
19.63%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -24.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
128.81%
Slight usage while BIDU is negative at -599.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-175.78%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
88.73%
Inventory growth of 88.73% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-282.76%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
147.48%
Some yoy usage while BIDU is negative at -954.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-1452.63%
Negative yoy while BIDU is 252.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
29.51%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of BIDU's 46.65%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-33.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -17.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
618.33%
Some acquisitions while BIDU is negative at -525.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-92.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
69.12%
Liquidation growth of 69.12% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
72.70%
Growth well above BIDU's 95.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-55.80%
We reduce yoy invests while BIDU stands at 47.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
13.33%
We repay more while BIDU is negative at -1.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.