PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.87%
Negative net income growth while BIDU stands at 39.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.64%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-295.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.16%
Less SBC growth vs. BIDU's 30.53%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
184.92%
Slight usage while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-370.04%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-123.08%
Negative yoy inventory while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-192.09%
Negative yoy AP while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
223.91%
Some yoy usage while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
54.50%
Some yoy increase while BIDU is negative at -7533.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
28.15%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-12.84%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
81.57%
Acquisition spending well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-7.13%
Negative yoy purchasing while BIDU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
50.16%
Liquidation growth of 50.16% while BIDU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
19.90%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BIDU's 100.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
83.85%
Investing outflow well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-60.17%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.