PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-144.86%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BIDU at -47.67%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
15.05%
Some D&A expansion while BIDU is negative at -25.97%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
105.41%
Well above BIDU's 9.74% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
1.48%
Less SBC growth vs. BIDU's 16.05%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
3361.19%
Slight usage while BIDU is negative at -30.33%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-165.13%
AR is negative yoy while BIDU is 7.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
11304.55%
Inventory growth well above BIDU's 342.45%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
1203.28%
A yoy AP increase while BIDU is negative at -50.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
875.50%
Some yoy usage while BIDU is negative at -68.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-48.94%
Negative yoy while BIDU is 100.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
4.01%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -9.45%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-21.74%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 53.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
89.23%
Some acquisitions while BIDU is negative at -94.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
63.38%
Purchases well above BIDU's 12.81%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-58.91%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BIDU at -1.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-33.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -78.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
51.58%
Investing outflow well above BIDU's 34.03%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
40.32%
We repay more while BIDU is negative at -130.60%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.