PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
238.00 - 242.07
140.53 - 242.25
26.77M / 38.44M (Avg.)
25.64 | 9.39
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
411.29%
Net income growth above 1.5x BIDU's 60.95%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-1.97%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-212.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
33.03%
SBC growth while BIDU is negative at -20.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-88.58%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
155.76%
AR growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-167.71%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-81.87%
Both negative yoy AP, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-90.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-4612.50%
Both negative yoy, with BIDU at -83122.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
13.38%
Some CFO growth while BIDU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-69.47%
Negative yoy CapEx while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-8828.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
36.10%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. BIDU's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-15.74%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BIDU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
66.67%
Growth well above BIDU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-12.50%
We reduce yoy invests while BIDU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-109.16%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BIDU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.43%
We cut yoy buybacks while BIDU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.